tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10485390.post576241970292075067..comments2024-03-01T03:17:37.454-05:00Comments on Dalai's PACS Blog: (MIM)Vistas of New OrleansDalaihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17775491711029994911noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10485390.post-67638278419138608542008-06-23T10:33:00.000-04:002008-06-23T10:33:00.000-04:00Ryan, you may want to look into MIMvista's ability...Ryan, you may want to look into MIMvista's ability to integrate as a PACS plugin as well. We have concurrent licenses setup at several of our institutions on our PACS workstations and they work beautifully. Moreover we have used Medview before, and our doctors specifically requested a switch to MIMvista. Maybe the Dalai can explain why.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10485390.post-59550119736199399622008-06-19T13:35:00.000-04:002008-06-19T13:35:00.000-04:00Our hospital just purchased MedView as it's PET/CT...Our hospital just purchased MedView as it's PET/CT diagnostic software solution. We had the option to use MIMVista for free, but we didn't like it as much as MedView. Our radiologists use both MedView and MIMVista as they float between two hospitals. So far, they have all said they like the MedView better.<BR/><BR/>However, the idea of the auto-comparison of old studies really has my attention...that would be awesome. Hopefully, MedImage (the company that makes MedView) will get on the ball with that capability so as not to lose customers.<BR/><BR/>Our MedView also comes with a separate, yet integrated program, called 4DM-SPECT for reading our cardiac nuclear medicine studies. The beauty of all this is that it is all interfaced through an API plugin to our PACS, Philips iSite. So it is all seamlessly done from any PACS workstation in our network. The MedView licenses are floated between concurrent users.<BR/><BR/>I'm curious, have you used MedView? Does MIMVista have advantages over it that I should be bugging our vendor about?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com